AI Video · Open Research

AI Video Pricing Benchmarks 2026

Citable statistics derived from AI Video Signal’s dated, source-linked dataset—not a “cheapest tool wins” ranking.

Dataset checked: August 29, 202614 providers11 normalized paid-price references
Important: The $15 median below is a public starting/reference-price benchmark only. It does not mean two $15 plans deliver equal output. Billing cadence, promotions, included usage, model quality and credit burn differ materially.
$15Median paid starting/reference price across 11 normalized rows
13/14Providers with some free-entry signal in the dated references
3Free tiers explicitly normalized as non-commercial
4Providers with explicit generation-unit economics in the dataset

What the benchmark actually says

Across the 14-provider research dataset, 11 providers had an explicit paid monthly or monthly-equivalent public reference that could be normalized without inventing a number. The median of those 11 references is $15, with a range from $6 to $29.

That range is useful for budgeting a software subscription, but it is not enough for estimating production economics. A $10 plan can be more expensive per approved clip than a $29 plan if generation burn, retries or export limits are different.

Normalized paid starting/reference prices

ElevenLabs$6.00
Starter monthly
Kling AI$8.80
Standard renewal
Pika$10.00
Standard monthly
Hailuo AI$14.99
Standard monthly
Runway$15.00
Standard monthly
OpusClip$15.00
Starter monthly
InVideo AI$17.00
Plus monthly-equivalent
Submagic$19.00
Starter monthly
Fliki$28.00
Standard monthly
HeyGen$29.00
Creator monthly
Synthesia$29.00
Starter monthly

Kling uses the renewal reference rather than its introductory figure. InVideo uses the monthly-equivalent figure shown with annual billing in the dated dataset. These choices are disclosed to avoid mixing promotional and recurring pricing silently.

ProviderUSD referenceReferenceCaveatSource
ElevenLabs$6.00Starter monthlyMonthly public reference.Official source
Kling AI$8.80Standard renewalUses renewal reference; provider also showed a $6.99 intro price.Official source
Pika$10.00Standard monthlyCreator-plan public reference.Official source
Hailuo AI$14.99Standard monthlySubscription-terms reference; promotional pages can differ.Official source
Runway$15.00Standard monthlyMonthly public reference; annualized price is lower.Official source
OpusClip$15.00Starter monthlyMonthly public reference.Official source
InVideo AI$17.00Plus monthly-equivalentDisplayed monthly-equivalent with annual billing in the dated dataset.Official source
Submagic$19.00Starter monthlyMonthly public reference; annualized price is lower.Official source
Fliki$28.00Standard monthlyMonthly public reference.Official source
HeyGen$29.00Creator monthlyMonthly public reference; annualized price is lower.Official source
Synthesia$29.00Starter monthlyMonthly public reference.Official source

Free access is common; free commercial rights are not

13 of 14 dataset rows show some form of free-entry signal—free plan, free access, trial-like entry or “start for free.” Google Veo was deliberately left unnormalized because access and metering depend on the Google product/endpoint.

But free access should not be confused with permission to monetize output. In the dataset, Fliki, ElevenLabs and OpusClip are explicitly normalized as no for commercial use on the free tier. Synthesia is conditional, while Vizard and Submagic remain unclear and Hypernatural carries a caution status. “Unclear” is not a prohibition; it means the public terms were not reduced to a clean plan-level yes/no.

Why raw credit counts are a bad benchmark

Credits are vendor-specific accounting units. A Runway credit, Kling credit, Pika creator credit and Hailuo credit do not represent the same amount of video. Only four providers in this dataset have sufficiently explicit generation-unit economics to support a dated normalization at the model/duration level: Runway, Kling AI, Pika’s API reference and Hailuo AI.

For production planning, use the AI Video Cost Calculator and Budget Planner rather than comparing headline credits.

Download and cite the benchmark

Journalists, analysts and bloggers can reuse these dated figures with attribution. The benchmark summary is available as CSV and JSON, and the underlying provider-level dataset is also open for inspection.

Suggested citation:
AI Video Signal, “AI Video Pricing Benchmarks 2026,” dataset checked August 29, 2026. https://aivideosignal.com/ai-video-pricing-benchmarks/

Methodology

The benchmark is derived only from fields already normalized in the AI Video Research Dataset 2026. Missing or unstable figures stay excluded rather than being estimated. Affiliate status is recorded separately and contributes zero points to editorial scoring. See How We Review for evidence tiers, update policy and cost-normalization rules.

FAQ

Is $15 the average cost of an AI video generator?

No. It is the median of 11 normalized paid starting/reference prices in this specific dated dataset. It does not represent average cost per generated or approved video.

Why are Vizard, Hypernatural and Google Veo excluded from the price median?

The dataset did not contain a stable comparable paid starting price that met the normalization rule for this benchmark. Excluding them is more rigorous than guessing.

Can I quote these numbers?

Yes, with attribution and the checked date. For a purchase decision, verify the linked provider source because pricing and terms can change.